Should Canned Smoke be Used to Test Smoke Detectors?
Smoke from fires has large particles and it has small; it has light particles and it has dark; it has solid particles and it has liquid. No two fires put out the same type of smoke. When testing, canned smoke approved by the manufacture is about the best type of testing smoke.
Smoke detectors have to detect a wide range of smoke. People often wonder if canned smoke mimics real smoke or is there something better to use for testing.
By Douglas Krantz
There have been many discussions about the best way to test smoke detectors --- canned smoke or real smoke. The problem is finding something to test with that mimics fire without burning down the building.
Smoke Detectors Don't Detect Fire
Most fire detection devices don't detect fire
; most fire detection devices detect "products of fire".
Heat detectors only sense that the temperature is above a certain level, or that the temperature is rising. They can't tell if a fire caused the temperature to rise, or that the boiler room is just a little hotter than normal.
only sense that water is flowing in a pipe, or that the pressure in the pipe is above a certain level. They can't tell if a fire was causing the water to flow, or if a ladder broke a sprinkler head causing the water to flow, or if the pipes froze and broke causing the water to flow.
Smoke detectors only sense that there are particles in the air. They can't tell if the particles are smoke caused by a fire, or the particles are smoke caused by overheated bacon, or if the particles are spray paint.
Smoke Detector False Alarms
Smoke detectors, though, are more susceptible to false alarms because what they see as smoke can be so many other things.
Smoke Isn't Fire
First off, smoke is a byproduct of fire. Most of the time, not being fire, smoke is actually unburnt fire fuel. It comes in a huge variety of particle sizes and colors, and some of the particles are solid while some of the particles are liquid.
Just from a single fire, there are lots of variations in the particles --- and the mixture changes as the fire progresses. To make smoke particles more difficult to catalog, each fire produces different smoke variations from any other fire.
Smoke Detector Chemical Analyzing
The problem is that smoke detectors can't perform a full chemical analysis; they can't determine the chemical makeup of smoke.
In a kitchen, for instance, smoke detectors have a difficult time detecting the difference between a grease fire and Cajun cooking
. The percentages of the particulates may be slightly different, but the detectors just aren't able to tell the difference.
Different Kinds of Smoke Detectors
Just to make smoke detection more interesting, smoke detectors themselves come in a number of varieties. Some are more sensitive to large particles and some are more sensitive to small particles; some are more sensitive to light colored particles and some are more sensitive to darker colored particles.
Testing Smoke Detectors
When testing, it would be easier to say what is better, canned smoke or real smoke --- except there is no canned smoke or even real smoke that mimics all the different varieties of fire caused smoke.
Using the Manufacturer's Testing Method
With all these variations --- smoke variations and detector variations --- it would probably be best to test smoke detectors using the manufacturer's recommended method.
Based on his electronics training, and his understanding of Life Safety, Douglas Krantz has compiled his knowledge of Conventional Fire Alarm Systems into the book Make It Work - Conventional Fire Alarms
. The book covers the basics of the Conventional Fire Alarm System, and shows how Life Safety and internal supervision affects the fire alarm system.
Share This With Friends: